G vs. CVLT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Genpact Limited (G) and Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT).

Performance

G vs. CVLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genpact Limited (G) and Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

G vs. CVLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
G Genpact Limited	-19.98%	10.56%	25.78%	-23.98%	-11.74%	29.51%	-0.93%	57.66%	-14.12%	31.54%
CVLT Commvault Systems, Inc.	-37.87%	-16.93%	88.99%	27.07%	-8.82%	24.47%	24.04%	-24.45%	12.55%	2.14%

Fundamentals

Market Cap G : $6.52B CVLT : $3.47B
EPS G : $3.14 CVLT : $1.93
PE Ratio G : 11.87 CVLT : 40.31
PEG Ratio G : 0.67 CVLT : 0.09
PS Ratio G : 1.29 CVLT : 3.06
PB Ratio G : 2.56 CVLT : 16.03
Total Revenue (TTM) G : $5.08B CVLT : $1.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) G : $1.83B CVLT : $934.16M
EBITDA (TTM) G : $855.28M CVLT : $107.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G achieves a -19.98% return, which is significantly higher than CVLT's -37.87% return. Over the past 10 years, G has underperformed CVLT with an annualized return of 4.15%, while CVLT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.99% annualized return.

G

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: -19.98%
• 6M: -10.31%
• 1Y: -24.83%
• 3Y*: -5.45%
• 5Y*: -1.58%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

CVLT

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -8.45%
• YTD: -37.87%
• 6M: -58.74%
• 1Y: -50.63%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

G vs. CVLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G

G Risk / Return Rank: 11
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
G Omega Ratio Rank: 12
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
G Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CVLT

CVLT Risk / Return Rank: 8
CVLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CVLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CVLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CVLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CVLT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G vs. CVLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genpact Limited (G) and Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	G	CVLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	-0.90	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	-1.17	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.82	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.84	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.62	-1.71	+0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

G vs. CVLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the CVLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G and CVLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	G	CVLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	-0.90	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.08	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.16	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.20	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between G and CVLT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

G vs. CVLT - Dividend Comparison

G's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, while CVLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
G Genpact Limited	1.87%	1.45%	1.42%	1.58%	1.08%	0.81%	0.94%	0.81%	1.11%	0.76%
CVLT Commvault Systems, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

G vs. CVLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G drawdown since its inception was -64.14%, smaller than the maximum CVLT drawdown of -68.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G and CVLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	G	CVLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.14%	-68.89%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.35%	-61.53%	+34.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.31%	-61.53%	+20.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.47%	-61.53%	+12.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.58%	-60.14%	+28.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.29%	-26.70%	+11.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.95%	30.33%	-15.38%

Volatility

G vs. CVLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genpact Limited (G) is 7.76%, while Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that G experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	G	CVLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.76%	11.75%	-3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.62%	48.51%	-21.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.87%	56.43%	-20.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.88%	41.57%	-13.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.64%	37.17%	-9.53%

Financials

G vs. CVLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genpact Limited and Commvault Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

G - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported a gross profit of 482.29M and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

CVLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.54M and revenue of 313.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.

G - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported an operating income of 195.46M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

CVLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 19.77M and revenue of 313.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

G - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported a net income of 143.09M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

CVLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 17.78M and revenue of 313.83M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.