FZALX vs. CRQSX
FZALX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z) and CRQSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, FZALX returned 25.73%/yr vs 22.42%/yr for CRQSX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FZALX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for CRQSX.
Performance
FZALX vs. CRQSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZALX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than CRQSX's 11.91% return.
FZALX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 31.53%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.44%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
CRQSX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FZALX vs. CRQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z | 10.54% | 27.07% | 26.13% | 26.63% | -6.46% |
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 11.91% | 16.83% | 24.70% | 27.55% | -11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FZALX and CRQSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FZALX and CRQSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FZALX vs. CRQSX — Risk / Return Rank
FZALX
CRQSX
FZALX vs. CRQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZALX | CRQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 2.39 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.72 | 3.25 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.27 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.39 | 15.04 | +1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZALX | CRQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.39 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.85 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
FZALX vs. CRQSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZALX drawdown since its inception was -35.23%, which is greater than CRQSX's maximum drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZALX and CRQSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZALX | CRQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.23% | -22.96% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -8.71% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -18.95% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | 0.00% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -5.27% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.89% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FZALX vs. CRQSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) is 2.73%, while Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that FZALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FZALX | CRQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.88% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.06% | 9.03% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 11.92% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 17.85% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 17.85% | +0.29% |
FZALX vs. CRQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZALX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CRQSX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FZALX vs. CRQSX - Dividend Comparison
FZALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than CRQSX's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 3.30% | 3.66% | 2.09% | 1.34% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z | 3.65% | 4.04% | 2.83% | 2.17% | 4.51% | 4.92% | 8.14% | 13.19% | 21.94% | 16.56% | 2.12% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FZALX and CRQSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CRQSX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to FZALX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZALX dropped -35.23% vs CRQSX's -22.96%.
FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FZALX and CRQSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer