CRQSX vs. CMMVX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRQSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund) and CMMVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund) are both mutual funds - CRQSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds, while CMMVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds. Over the past 3 years, CRQSX returned 22.34%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for CMMVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CRQSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMMVX.

Performance

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRQSX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than CMMVX's 7.46% return.

CRQSX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 6M: 11.84%
• 1Y: 28.10%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMMVX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 8.03%
• 1Y: 17.95%
• 3Y*: 13.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund	11.70%	16.83%	24.70%	27.55%	-11.69%
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund	7.46%	13.09%	12.44%	16.24%	-10.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CRQSX and CMMVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022	0.96

The correlation between CRQSX and CMMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRQSX vs. CMMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRQSX

CRQSX Risk / Return Rank: 68
CRQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CRQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CRQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CRQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CRQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CMMVX

CMMVX Risk / Return Rank: 61
CMMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CMMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CMMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CMMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CMMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRQSX	CMMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.29	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.30	-0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	2.88	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.08	12.73	+2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRQSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the CMMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRQSX and CMMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRQSX	CMMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.29	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.70	+0.15

Drawdowns

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRQSX drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, which is greater than CMMVX's maximum drawdown of -20.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRQSX and CMMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRQSX	CMMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.96%	-20.58%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.71%	-6.31%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.95%	-11.51%	-7.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-5.47%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.43%	+0.46%

Volatility

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Volatility Comparison

Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) at 2.38%. This indicates that CRQSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRQSX	CMMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	2.38%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.04%	6.27%	+2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	8.02%	+3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.86%	10.69%	+7.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	10.69%	+7.17%

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRQSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CMMVX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CRQSX vs. CMMVX - Dividend Comparison

CRQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than CMMVX's 3.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund	3.43%	3.68%	3.00%	2.31%	1.76%	0.08%
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund	3.30%	3.66%	2.09%	1.34%	1.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRQSX and CMMVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, CRQSX and CMMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CRQSX or CMMVX?

CRQSX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to CMMVX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRQSX dropped -22.96% vs CMMVX's -20.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.