CRQSX vs. CMPVX
CRQSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund) and CMPVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund) are both mutual funds - CRQSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds, while CMPVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds. Over the past 3 years, CRQSX returned 21.03%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for CMPVX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CRQSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMPVX.
Performance
CRQSX vs. CMPVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRQSX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than CMPVX's 7.62% return.
CRQSX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMPVX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 6M
- 7.14%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRQSX vs. CMPVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 9.88% | 16.83% | 24.70% | 27.55% | -11.69% |
CMPVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund | 7.62% | 12.97% | 10.59% | 16.55% | -11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRQSX and CMPVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CRQSX and CMPVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRQSX vs. CMPVX — Risk / Return Rank
CRQSX
CMPVX
CRQSX vs. CMPVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRQSX | CMPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.63 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | 11.28 | +1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRQSX vs. CMPVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRQSX drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, which is greater than CMPVX's maximum drawdown of -21.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRQSX and CMPVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRQSX | CMPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.96% | -21.62% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -6.52% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.95% | -10.96% | -7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -0.25% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -5.78% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.51% | +0.45% |
Volatility
CRQSX vs. CMPVX - Volatility Comparison
Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) at 3.24%. This indicates that CRQSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMPVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRQSX | CMPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 3.24% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 7.02% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.60% | 8.58% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 10.96% | +6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 10.96% | +6.91% |
CRQSX vs. CMPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRQSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CMPVX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CRQSX vs. CMPVX - Dividend Comparison
CRQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than CMPVX's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMPVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund | 4.24% | 4.57% | 3.32% | 2.04% | 1.58% | 0.07% |
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 3.36% | 3.66% | 2.09% | 1.34% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CRQSX and CMPVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CRQSX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to CMPVX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRQSX dropped -22.96% vs CMPVX's -21.62%.
CRQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRQSX and CMPVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer