FZAHX vs. FGTAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX).
FZAHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. FGTAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 5, 2008.
Performance
FZAHX vs. FGTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAHX vs. FGTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | -9.46% | 22.61% | 39.23% | 45.70% | -38.18% | 11.74% | 69.25% | 40.80% | 15.25% | 35.10% |
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A | -2.19% | 26.58% | 25.62% | 26.18% | -9.26% | 25.98% | 12.59% | 30.74% | -7.68% | 17.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAHX achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than FGTAX's -2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAHX has outperformed FGTAX with an annualized return of 19.64%, while FGTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.11% annualized return.
FZAHX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -8.34%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 19.64%
FGTAX
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 25.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAHX vs. FGTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FGTAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAHX vs. FGTAX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAHX
FGTAX
FZAHX vs. FGTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAHX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.07 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.22 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 10.24 | -4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAHX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.88 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.84 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.56 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAHX and FGTAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAHX vs. FGTAX - Dividend Comparison
FZAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than FGTAX's 3.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | 3.98% | 3.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 5.15% | 3.74% | 11.00% | 7.50% | 14.42% | 10.52% |
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A | 3.80% | 3.72% | 2.48% | 1.86% | 4.17% | 4.61% | 7.84% | 12.91% | 21.65% | 16.21% | 1.75% | 3.75% |
Drawdowns
FZAHX vs. FGTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, smaller than the maximum FGTAX drawdown of -53.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAHX and FGTAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAHX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.45% | -53.07% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -12.16% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.45% | -23.48% | -20.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.45% | -35.21% | -9.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.06% | -6.19% | -5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -6.83% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 2.64% | +1.81% |
Volatility
FZAHX vs. FGTAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) at 5.53%. This indicates that FZAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAHX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 5.53% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 9.75% | +5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 18.36% | +6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 16.70% | +8.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 18.12% | +5.70% |