PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAHX vs. VMVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAHX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than VMVAX's 16.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAHX has outperformed VMVAX with an annualized return of 21.16%, while VMVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.


FZAHX

1D
3.39%
1M
-5.30%
6M
8.59%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
24.43%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
21.16%
ALL TIME*
18.74%

VMVAX

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.54%
6M
12.16%
YTD
16.91%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
10.77%
ALL TIME*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAHX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z
7.56%22.61%39.23%45.70%-38.18%11.74%69.25%40.80%15.25%35.10%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
16.91%12.06%13.63%10.12%-7.89%28.77%2.45%28.03%-12.44%17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAHX and VMVAX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FZAHX and VMVAX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAHX vs. VMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZAHX
FZAHX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FZAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVAX
VMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZAHXVMVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

3.58

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

13.96

-10.35

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the VMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAHX and VMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, roughly equal to the maximum VMVAX drawdown of -43.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAHX and VMVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAHXVMVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-43.07%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.06%

-6.95%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-18.40%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.45%

-19.75%

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

-43.07%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

-1.07%

-7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-4.33%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

1.78%

+2.88%

Volatility

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) at 2.69%. This indicates that FZAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAHXVMVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

2.69%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.86%

8.12%

+9.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

11.39%

+10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.32%

15.88%

+9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

18.69%

+5.41%

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVAX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAHX vs. VMVAX - Dividend Comparison

FZAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than VMVAX's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAHX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z
3.35%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.45%5.15%3.74%11.00%7.50%14.42%10.52%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.81%2.10%2.11%2.26%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.08%2.75%1.86%1.91%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAHX and VMVAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZAHX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to VMVAX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAHX dropped -44.45% vs VMVAX's -43.07%.

VMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAHX and VMVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer