PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAHX vs. FZAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAHX achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than FZAFX's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAHX has outperformed FZAFX with an annualized return of 22.58%, while FZAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.27% annualized return.


FZAHX

1D
0.75%
1M
9.23%
YTD
16.99%
6M
17.98%
1Y
42.24%
3Y*
32.24%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
22.58%

FZAFX

1D
0.71%
1M
6.92%
YTD
15.05%
6M
14.41%
1Y
31.33%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
18.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAHX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z
16.99%22.61%39.23%45.70%-38.18%11.74%69.25%40.80%15.25%35.10%
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
15.05%14.68%18.15%35.80%-24.36%23.09%43.86%35.68%0.36%35.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAHX and FZAFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.95

The correlation between FZAHX and FZAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAHX vs. FZAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAHX
FZAHX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FZAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FZAFX
FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAHXFZAFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

1.98

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

2.66

+0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.54

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.21

9.73

+0.49

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the FZAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAHX and FZAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAHXFZAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.98

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.88

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.84

+0.04

Drawdowns

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, which is greater than FZAFX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAHX and FZAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAHXFZAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-31.13%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.06%

-12.55%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-29.19%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.45%

-29.73%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

-31.13%

-13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-5.78%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

3.28%

+0.99%

Volatility

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) at 4.18%. This indicates that FZAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAHXFZAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.18%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

12.70%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

16.35%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.84%

20.62%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

20.76%

+3.13%

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAFX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAHX vs. FZAFX - Dividend Comparison

FZAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than FZAFX's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
0.45%0.51%0.00%0.48%1.93%11.39%10.84%9.53%6.38%11.66%5.87%0.00%
FZAHX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z
3.08%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.45%5.15%3.74%11.00%7.50%14.42%10.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FZAHX and FZAFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZAHX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to FZAFX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAHX dropped -44.45% vs FZAFX's -31.13%.

FZAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAHX and FZAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer