FZAHX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
FZAHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
FZAHX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAHX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | -13.57% | 22.61% | 39.23% | 45.70% | -38.18% | 11.74% | 69.25% | 40.80% | 15.25% | 35.10% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAHX achieves a -13.57% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAHX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 19.08%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.43% annualized return.
FZAHX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -13.57%
- 6M
- -12.17%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAHX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAHX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAHX
FCGSX
FZAHX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAHX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.40 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.02 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.29 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.25 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 10.23 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAHX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.40 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.61 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.93 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.87 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAHX and FCGSX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAHX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
FZAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | 4.17% | 3.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 5.15% | 3.74% | 11.00% | 7.50% | 14.42% | 10.52% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
FZAHX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAHX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAHX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.45% | -38.77% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -13.10% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.45% | -38.77% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.45% | -38.77% | -5.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -10.42% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -7.05% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.88% | +1.50% |
Volatility
FZAHX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) have volatilities of 6.78% and 6.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAHX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 6.66% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 13.74% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.02% | 23.80% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 23.62% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 23.15% | +0.63% |