FZAFX vs. RYGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FZAFX (Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX returned 18.32%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for RYGRX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FZAFX charges 0.60%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.

Performance

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 18.32%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.20% annualized return.

FZAFX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 7.33%
• YTD: 15.53%
• 6M: 14.97%
• 1Y: 31.11%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 18.32%

RYGRX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 11.15%
• YTD: 30.14%
• 6M: 30.55%
• 1Y: 37.82%
• 3Y*: 25.67%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 13.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z	15.53%	14.68%	18.15%	35.80%	-24.36%	23.09%	43.86%	35.68%	0.36%	35.37%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	30.14%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAFX and RYGRX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013	0.91

The correlation between FZAFX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FZAFX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAFX

FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 55
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FZAFX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.00	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.70	-0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	3.53	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	13.56	-3.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FZAFX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.00	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.47	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.58	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.44	+0.41

Drawdowns

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and RYGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZAFX	RYGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.13%	-54.22%	+23.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.55%	-11.17%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.19%	-24.95%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.73%	-36.57%	+6.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.13%	-36.63%	+5.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-9.41%	+3.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	2.91%	+0.37%

Volatility

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) is 4.18%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that FZAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZAFX	RYGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	6.39%	-2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.69%	16.30%	-3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.32%	19.71%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.62%	23.50%	-2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	22.88%	-2.12%

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZAFX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z	0.44%	0.51%	0.00%	0.48%	1.93%	11.39%	10.84%	9.53%	6.38%	11.66%	5.87%	0.00%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.91%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZAFX and RYGRX in my portfolio?

FZAFX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FZAFX or RYGRX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to FZAFX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAFX dropped -31.13% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.