PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYX vs. SMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYX vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 25.10% return, which is significantly higher than SMDV's 17.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FYX has outperformed SMDV with an annualized return of 13.63%, while SMDV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.


FYX

1D
0.79%
1M
4.88%
YTD
25.10%
6M
22.59%
1Y
49.42%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
13.63%

SMDV

1D
1.09%
1M
5.76%
YTD
17.53%
6M
15.17%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYX vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
25.10%12.68%12.22%18.30%-18.41%27.43%19.48%21.32%-10.64%14.34%
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
17.53%0.26%7.03%8.99%-5.90%18.98%-4.74%17.23%-0.58%4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FYX and SMDV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.84

The correlation between FYX and SMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYX vs. SMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYX
SMDV

Financial Services

17.3%
32.8%

Industrials

16.6%
21.9%

Healthcare

14.0%
1.6%

Technology

11.7%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
4.1%

Real Estate

8.6%
7.5%

Energy

5.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.4%

Basic Materials

4.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.1%
1.1%

Utilities

1.6%
15.7%

Financial Services

FYX
17.3%
SMDV
32.8%

Industrials

FYX
16.6%
SMDV
21.9%

Healthcare

FYX
14.0%
SMDV
1.6%

Technology

FYX
11.7%
SMDV
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FYX
11.7%
SMDV
4.1%

Real Estate

FYX
8.6%
SMDV
7.5%

Energy

FYX
5.7%
SMDV

-

Consumer Defensive

FYX
5.3%
SMDV
4.4%

Basic Materials

FYX
4.5%
SMDV
8.3%

Communication Services

FYX
3.1%
SMDV
1.1%

Utilities

FYX
1.6%
SMDV
15.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYX vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SMDV
SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYX vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYXSMDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.57

2.31

+4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.39

7.02

+14.37

FYX vs. SMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the SMDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYX and SMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYX vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than SMDV's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and SMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYXSMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.80%

-34.12%

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

-9.79%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.91%

-21.23%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-21.23%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.82%

-34.12%

-14.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-5.91%

-4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.21%

-0.89%

Volatility

FYX vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) at 4.18%. This indicates that FYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYXSMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.18%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

10.61%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.36%

15.69%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

18.62%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.19%

20.74%

+3.45%

FYX vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYX vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison

FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SMDV's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.97%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.30%2.67%2.68%2.69%2.51%2.02%2.13%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.35%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYX and SMDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to SMDV (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs SMDV's -34.12%.

On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 13.63% vs 7.94% for SMDV. On fees, SMDV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMDV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.97% for FYX.

FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while SMDV tracks Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.40% for SMDV.

FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYX and SMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer