FYT vs. SCHG
FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYT returned 10.88%/yr vs 18.50%/yr for SCHG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYT charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
FYT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYT achieves a 21.84% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FYT has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.88%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.
FYT
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 21.84%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 38.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
FYT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 21.84% | 4.00% | 3.24% | 22.90% | -14.05% | 29.33% | 9.82% | 25.80% | -14.73% | 7.14% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYT and SCHG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FYT and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYT vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYT
SCHG
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYT
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
FYT
SCHG
Industrials
FYT
SCHG
Real Estate
FYT
SCHG
Technology
FYT
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
FYT
SCHG
Energy
FYT
SCHG
Healthcare
FYT
SCHG
Basic Materials
FYT
SCHG
Communication Services
FYT
SCHG
Utilities
FYT
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FYT
SCHG
FYT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 1.14 | +3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.26 | 3.78 | +9.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.48% | -34.59% | -15.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -16.41% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.90% | -23.39% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.90% | -34.59% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.48% | -34.59% | -15.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.33% | +5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -5.20% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 4.96% | -2.03% |
Volatility
FYT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) is 4.36%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that FYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 5.14% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 12.30% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 15.95% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 22.33% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.95% | 21.58% | +4.37% |
FYT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.06% | 0.94% | 2.07% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.96% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to FYT (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 10.88% for FYT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FYT has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.
FYT has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
FYT is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.04% for SCHG.
FYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYT and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer