FYT vs. IWN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - FYT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index while IWN tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYT returned 10.80%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for IWN. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYT charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.

Performance

FYT vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FYT having a 20.07% return and IWN slightly higher at 20.82%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FYT having a 10.80% annualized return and IWN not far behind at 10.72%.

FYT

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 6M: 18.81%
• 1Y: 38.55%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

IWN

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 20.82%
• 6M: 18.59%
• 1Y: 42.32%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYT vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	20.07%	4.00%	3.24%	22.90%	-14.05%	29.33%	9.82%	25.80%	-14.73%	7.14%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	20.82%	12.40%	7.63%	14.56%	-14.77%	27.96%	4.66%	22.01%	-13.01%	7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FYT and IWN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011	0.90

The correlation between FYT and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYT vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FYT	IWN
Financial Services	25.5%	23.9%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	8.9%
Industrials	12.9%	12.1%
Real Estate	9.1%	10.2%
Technology	8.4%	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	2.1%
Energy	7.2%	7.9%
Healthcare	6.1%	10.1%
Basic Materials	4.6%	5.4%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.7%
Utilities	2.7%	5.1%

Return for Risk

FYT vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYT

FYT Risk / Return Rank: 74
FYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FYT Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FYT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 80
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYT vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FYT	IWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.36	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.30	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.40	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	5.03	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.20	16.92	-3.72

FYT vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYT Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYT and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FYT vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and IWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYT	IWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.48%	-61.55%	+11.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-8.45%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.90%	-26.70%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.90%	-26.70%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.48%	-46.08%	-4.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-0.20%	-1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	-10.14%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.51%	+0.42%

Volatility

FYT vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) is 4.31%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYT	IWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	5.29%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	12.29%	-0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.77%	18.04%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.53%	21.41%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.94%	23.39%	+2.55%

FYT vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYT vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than IWN's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.08%	0.94%	2.07%	1.50%	1.36%	1.19%	0.96%	1.44%	1.78%	1.16%	1.16%	0.96%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.46%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYT and IWN in my portfolio?

FYT and IWN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FYT or IWN?

IWN has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to FYT (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs IWN's -61.55%.

Which ETF is better, FYT or IWN?

On 10-year performance, FYT leads with 10.80% vs 10.72% for IWN. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, FYT has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FYT or IWN?

Over the 10-year period, FYT has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FYT or IWN?

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FYT or IWN?

IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.08% for FYT.

What is the main difference between FYT and IWN?

FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.24% for IWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.