PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYT vs. FNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYT vs. FNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYT achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly higher than FNK's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FYT has outperformed FNK with an annualized return of 9.99%, while FNK has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.


FYT

1D
-1.70%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
15.42%
6M
14.14%
1Y
34.20%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
9.99%

FNK

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.68%
YTD
7.22%
6M
7.56%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYT vs. FNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYT
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
15.42%4.00%3.24%22.90%-14.05%29.33%9.82%25.80%-14.73%7.14%
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
7.22%5.65%6.65%21.03%-7.24%33.60%1.23%20.56%-14.72%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FYT and FNK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.90

The correlation between FYT and FNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYT vs. FNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYT
FNK

Financial Services

25.5%
25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
19.0%

Industrials

12.9%
12.8%

Real Estate

9.1%
7.5%

Technology

8.4%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
3.5%

Energy

7.2%
8.4%

Healthcare

6.1%
5.3%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.3%

Utilities

2.7%
4.4%

Financial Services

FYT
25.5%
FNK
25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FYT
13.3%
FNK
19.0%

Industrials

FYT
12.9%
FNK
12.8%

Real Estate

FYT
9.1%
FNK
7.5%

Technology

FYT
8.4%
FNK
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

FYT
7.2%
FNK
3.5%

Energy

FYT
7.2%
FNK
8.4%

Healthcare

FYT
6.1%
FNK
5.3%

Basic Materials

FYT
4.6%
FNK
4.0%

Communication Services

FYT
2.7%
FNK
1.3%

Utilities

FYT
2.7%
FNK
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYT vs. FNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYT
FYT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FNK
FNK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYT vs. FNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYTFNKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

2.15

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

6.23

+5.41

FYT vs. FNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the FNK Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYT and FNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYTFNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.29

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.33

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.39

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.40

-0.01

Drawdowns

FYT vs. FNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, roughly equal to the maximum FNK drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and FNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYTFNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.48%

-50.70%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-9.13%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-25.16%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.90%

-25.16%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.48%

-50.70%

+0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-2.16%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-6.84%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.15%

-0.20%

Volatility

FYT vs. FNK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) at 3.53%. This indicates that FYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYTFNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

3.53%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

9.69%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

15.36%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

21.04%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.96%

23.86%

+2.10%

FYT vs. FNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FNK's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYT vs. FNK - Dividend Comparison

FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FNK's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.56%1.53%1.63%1.76%1.66%1.27%1.61%1.82%1.76%1.40%1.38%1.45%
FYT
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.12%0.94%2.07%1.50%1.36%1.19%0.96%1.44%1.78%1.16%1.16%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FYT and FNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYT has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to FNK (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs FNK's -50.70%.

On 10-year performance, FYT leads with 9.99% vs 9.29% for FNK. On fees, FNK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FNK has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYT has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.

FNK has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.12% for FYT.

FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.70% for FNK.

FYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYT and FNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer