FYLD vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. FYLD is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYLD returned 11.83%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for GCOW. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

FYLD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 11.83%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.

FYLD

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 19.06%
• 6M: 19.12%
• 1Y: 37.39%
• 3Y*: 21.45%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

GCOW

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 11.61%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	19.06%	34.53%	3.00%	13.18%	-5.53%	18.67%	4.17%	17.83%	-14.47%	29.81%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	11.34%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.99%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and GCOW is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016	0.78

The correlation between FYLD and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYLD vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FYLD	GCOW
Energy	31.2%	22.9%
Financial Services	19.0%	-
Industrials	16.1%	12.6%
Basic Materials	9.0%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	17.0%
Communication Services	3.7%	14.5%
Technology	3.6%	1.3%
Utilities	1.6%	4.0%
Healthcare	-	14.8%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FYLD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 94
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 77
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 70
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FYLD	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.17	2.15	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.37	3.10	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.37	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.91	4.91	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.32	12.49	+11.82

FYLD vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLD Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLD and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYLD	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-37.64%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.44%	-4.77%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.15%	-12.35%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.12%	-21.48%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.55%	-37.64%	-6.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-3.46%	+2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.81%	-5.83%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	1.88%	-0.34%

Volatility

FYLD vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.74%. This indicates that FYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYLD	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	2.74%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.24%	8.07%	+1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	10.92%	+0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	13.51%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	16.18%	+1.83%

FYLD vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYLD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than GCOW's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.63%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.72%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYLD and GCOW in my portfolio?

FYLD and GCOW have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FYLD or GCOW?

FYLD has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to GCOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which ETF is better, FYLD or GCOW?

On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.83% vs 10.01% for GCOW. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FYLD or GCOW?

Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FYLD or GCOW?

FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FYLD or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.63% for FYLD.

What is the main difference between FYLD and GCOW?

FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.60% for GCOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.