PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYHTX vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYHTX achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 25.42% return.


FYHTX

1D
0.72%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
20.27%
6M
20.66%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*

CMDY

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
25.42%
6M
25.12%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
20.27%14.72%4.73%-8.62%15.32%26.43%-3.84%6.91%-11.04%
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
25.42%15.81%5.43%-9.33%14.55%26.38%1.15%4.96%-11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FYHTX and CMDY is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FYHTX and CMDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYHTX vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYHTX
FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYHTXCMDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.33

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

2.94

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

5.20

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.00

15.73

-3.73

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYHTX and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYHTXCMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.33

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.70

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.07

Drawdowns

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYHTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYHTX and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYHTXCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.22%

-31.19%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-7.73%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-10.08%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-26.56%

+1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-3.99%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.95%

-13.15%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.55%

+0.21%

Volatility

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) is 4.52%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that FYHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYHTXCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

5.21%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

14.20%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

16.18%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

15.81%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.48%

14.64%

-0.16%

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYHTX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYHTX vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

FYHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than CMDY's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.28%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%0.00%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
2.44%2.93%3.78%4.10%57.34%15.05%0.00%7.00%12.49%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FYHTX and CMDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMDY has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FYHTX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYHTX dropped -33.22% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

FYHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYHTX and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer