PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYC vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 25.16% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 23.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FYC has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 15.10%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.95% annualized return.


FYC

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.13%
YTD
25.16%
6M
22.15%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
28.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
15.10%

GRID

1D
-4.46%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.40%
6M
22.11%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
19.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYC vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
25.16%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.40%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and GRID is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.67

The correlation between FYC and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FYC vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYC
GRID

Healthcare

25.3%

-

Industrials

18.7%
24.2%

Technology

17.5%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
2.3%

Financial Services

8.9%

-

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Communication Services

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.7%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Energy

2.2%
1.6%

Utilities

1.6%
3.9%

Healthcare

FYC
25.3%
GRID

-

Industrials

FYC
18.7%
GRID
24.2%

Technology

FYC
17.5%
GRID
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FYC
9.5%
GRID
2.3%

Financial Services

FYC
8.9%
GRID

-

Real Estate

FYC
5.7%
GRID

-

Communication Services

FYC
3.7%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

FYC
3.7%
GRID
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FYC
3.2%
GRID

-

Energy

FYC
2.2%
GRID
1.6%

Utilities

FYC
1.6%
GRID
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYC vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYC vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYCGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

3.63

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.70

12.92

+6.78

FYC vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYC vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYCGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-40.56%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.73%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-20.77%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-29.64%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-40.56%

-7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-5.55%

+4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-8.42%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.29%

-0.40%

Volatility

FYC vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) is 7.00%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that FYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYCGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

10.12%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

18.23%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

21.26%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

21.37%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

22.80%

+1.81%

FYC vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYC vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.06%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYC and GRID have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to FYC (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.95% vs 15.10% for FYC. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.06% for FYC.

FYC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.70% for GRID.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYC and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer