PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXZ vs. DVXB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXZ vs. DVXB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than DVXB's 16.95% return.


FXZ

1D
-2.45%
1M
0.61%
YTD
24.42%
6M
22.36%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
11.46%

DVXB

1D
-1.98%
1M
1.22%
YTD
16.95%
6M
14.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXZ vs. DVXB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FXZ and DVXB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXZ vs. DVXB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXZ
FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DVXB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXZ vs. DVXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXZDVXBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

FXZ vs. DVXB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. DVXB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, which is greater than DVXB's maximum drawdown of -19.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and DVXB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXZDVXBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.46%

-19.77%

-45.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

-11.39%

+6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-7.10%

-4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

Volatility

FXZ vs. DVXB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXZDVXBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.77%

30.80%

-8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

30.80%

-6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.93%

30.80%

-5.87%

FXZ vs. DVXB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXB's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXZ vs. DVXB - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVXB
WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
1.44%1.74%1.81%1.97%1.56%1.11%1.51%1.58%1.38%1.01%1.19%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FXZ and DVXB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FXZ is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FXZ is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.

FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.

FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.89% for DVXB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXZ and DVXB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer