PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXU vs. VSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXU vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 9.56% return.


FXU

1D
0.59%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.17%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
9.27%

VSMV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.02%
YTD
9.56%
6M
10.15%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXU vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
6.79%21.86%22.50%-2.12%3.68%17.67%1.53%11.67%5.43%-3.95%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
9.56%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FXU and VSMV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FXU and VSMV has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXU vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXU
VSMV

Utilities

92.0%
0.0%

Industrials

4.2%
8.5%

Energy

3.7%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

17.6%

Financial Services

-

8.1%

Healthcare

-

14.8%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

34.4%

Utilities

FXU
92.0%
VSMV
0.0%

Industrials

FXU
4.2%
VSMV
8.5%

Energy

FXU
3.7%
VSMV
4.4%

Basic Materials

FXU

-

VSMV
1.8%

Communication Services

FXU

-

VSMV
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FXU

-

VSMV
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

FXU

-

VSMV
17.6%

Financial Services

FXU

-

VSMV
8.1%

Healthcare

FXU

-

VSMV
14.8%

Real Estate

FXU

-

VSMV
0.0%

Technology

FXU

-

VSMV
34.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXU vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXU
FXU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXU vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXUVSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.51

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

4.89

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

18.65

-13.39

FXU vs. VSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the VSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXU and VSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXUVSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.80

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.89

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.82

-0.41

Drawdowns

FXU vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, which is greater than VSMV's maximum drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and VSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXUVSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-31.33%

-17.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-5.18%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-13.22%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-17.96%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.80%

-0.54%

-6.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-3.41%

-4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.36%

+1.71%

Volatility

FXU vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 2.25%. This indicates that FXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXUVSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

2.25%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

6.33%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

9.07%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

12.86%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

15.04%

+3.28%

FXU vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXU vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison

FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than VSMV's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
2.19%2.29%2.41%2.52%2.03%2.00%3.97%2.34%2.40%3.81%2.62%3.90%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.31%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXU and VSMV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXU has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to VSMV (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs VSMV's -31.33%.

On 5-year performance, FXU leads with 11.81% vs 11.41% for VSMV. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FXU has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

FXU has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.

FXU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VSMV is Volatility Hedged Equity. FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.35% for VSMV.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXU and VSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer