FXU vs. VSMV
FXU (First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund) and VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Utilities Index, while VSMV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXU returned 11.81%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for VSMV. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXU charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for VSMV.
Performance
FXU vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 9.56% return.
FXU
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
VSMV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FXU vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 6.79% | 21.86% | 22.50% | -2.12% | 3.68% | 17.67% | 1.53% | 11.67% | 5.43% | -3.95% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.56% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 25.66% | 5.05% | 26.79% | -1.12% | 11.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXU and VSMV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FXU and VSMV has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FXU vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXU
VSMV
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
FXU
VSMV
Industrials
FXU
VSMV
Energy
FXU
VSMV
Basic Materials
FXU
-
VSMV
Communication Services
FXU
-
VSMV
Consumer Cyclical
FXU
-
VSMV
Consumer Defensive
FXU
-
VSMV
Financial Services
FXU
-
VSMV
Healthcare
FXU
-
VSMV
Real Estate
FXU
-
VSMV
Technology
FXU
-
VSMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXU vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank
FXU
VSMV
FXU vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXU | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.51 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 4.89 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 18.65 | -13.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXU | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.80 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.89 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.82 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
FXU vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, which is greater than VSMV's maximum drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and VSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXU | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.00% | -31.33% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | -5.18% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -13.22% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.87% | -17.96% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -0.54% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -3.41% | -4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.36% | +1.71% |
Volatility
FXU vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 2.25%. This indicates that FXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXU | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 2.25% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 6.33% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 9.07% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 12.86% | +3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 15.04% | +3.28% |
FXU vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXU vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison
FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than VSMV's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 2.19% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 2.00% | 3.97% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 3.81% | 2.62% | 3.90% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXU and VSMV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXU has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to VSMV (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs VSMV's -31.33%.
On 5-year performance, FXU leads with 11.81% vs 11.41% for VSMV. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXU has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.
FXU has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.
FXU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VSMV is Volatility Hedged Equity. FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.35% for VSMV.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXU and VSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer