PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXU vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXU vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FXU has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 9.21%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


FXU

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
6.16%
6M
5.04%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
9.21%

UTES

1D
-0.98%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXU vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
6.16%21.86%22.50%-2.12%3.68%17.67%1.53%11.67%5.43%0.98%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.08%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FXU and UTES is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.77

The correlation between FXU and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXU vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXU
UTES

Utilities

92.0%
100.0%

Industrials

4.2%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

FXU
92.0%
UTES
100.0%

Industrials

FXU
4.2%
UTES

-

Energy

FXU
3.7%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

FXU

-

UTES

-

Communication Services

FXU

-

UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXU

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

FXU

-

UTES

-

Financial Services

FXU

-

UTES

-

Healthcare

FXU

-

UTES

-

Real Estate

FXU

-

UTES

-

Technology

FXU

-

UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXU vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXU
FXU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXU vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXUUTESDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.37

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

0.64

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.08

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

0.57

+0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.43

1.30

+3.13

FXU vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXU and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXUUTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.37

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.76

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.62

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.70

-0.28

Drawdowns

FXU vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXUUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-35.39%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-13.88%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-17.62%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-20.40%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.81%

-35.39%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-9.26%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-5.52%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

6.08%

-3.01%

Volatility

FXU vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) is 4.65%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that FXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXUUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

7.40%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

16.95%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

21.27%

-8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

20.60%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

20.16%

-1.83%

FXU vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXU vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than UTES's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
2.20%2.29%2.41%2.52%2.03%2.00%3.97%2.34%2.40%3.81%2.62%3.90%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.50%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXU and UTES have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to FXU (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.40% vs 9.21% for FXU. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FXU has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

FXU has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.50% for UTES.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.49% for UTES.

FXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXU and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer