PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXU vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXU vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FXU has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 9.21%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.


FXU

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
6.16%
6M
5.04%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
9.21%

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXU vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
6.16%21.86%22.50%-2.12%3.68%17.67%1.53%11.67%5.43%0.98%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FXU and VEA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FXU and VEA has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXU vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXU
VEA

Utilities

92.0%
3.3%

Industrials

4.2%
19.2%

Energy

3.7%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Financial Services

-

23.3%

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Technology

-

13.8%

Utilities

FXU
92.0%
VEA
3.3%

Industrials

FXU
4.2%
VEA
19.2%

Energy

FXU
3.7%
VEA
5.4%

Basic Materials

FXU

-

VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

FXU

-

VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FXU

-

VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FXU

-

VEA
5.6%

Financial Services

FXU

-

VEA
23.3%

Healthcare

FXU

-

VEA
8.2%

Real Estate

FXU

-

VEA
2.7%

Technology

FXU

-

VEA
13.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXU vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXU
FXU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXU vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXUVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.81

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

10.94

-6.52

FXU vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXU and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXUVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.09

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.58

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.59

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.25

+0.17

Drawdowns

FXU vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXUVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-60.68%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-11.63%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-13.45%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-29.71%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.81%

-35.73%

+0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-0.90%

-6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-13.29%

+5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.98%

+0.09%

Volatility

FXU vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) is 4.65%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that FXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXUVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

5.66%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

13.32%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

15.66%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

16.55%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.36%

+0.97%

FXU vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXU vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
2.20%2.29%2.41%2.52%2.03%2.00%3.97%2.34%2.40%3.81%2.62%3.90%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXU and VEA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to FXU (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 9.21% for FXU. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FXU has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.20% for FXU.

FXU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXU and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer