PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXU vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXU vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than GII's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FXU has outperformed GII with an annualized return of 9.21%, while GII has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.


FXU

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
6.16%
6M
5.04%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
9.21%

GII

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.63%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXU vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
6.16%21.86%22.50%-2.12%3.68%17.67%1.53%11.67%5.43%0.98%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
7.74%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FXU and GII is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.68

The correlation between FXU and GII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXU vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXU
GII

Utilities

92.0%
26.5%

Industrials

4.2%
27.1%

Energy

3.7%
21.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

2.5%

Utilities

FXU
92.0%
GII
26.5%

Industrials

FXU
4.2%
GII
27.1%

Energy

FXU
3.7%
GII
21.5%

Basic Materials

FXU

-

GII

-

Communication Services

FXU

-

GII
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FXU

-

GII

-

Consumer Defensive

FXU

-

GII

-

Financial Services

FXU

-

GII
4.5%

Healthcare

FXU

-

GII

-

Real Estate

FXU

-

GII
0.1%

Technology

FXU

-

GII
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXU vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXU
FXU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXU vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXUGIIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.40

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

1.99

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.53

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.43

7.88

-3.45

FXU vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXU and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXUGIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.40

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.72

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.48

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.28

+0.13

Drawdowns

FXU vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GII drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and GII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXUGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-50.98%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-5.94%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-14.31%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-20.67%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.81%

-42.84%

+8.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-4.55%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-11.52%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.90%

+1.17%

Volatility

FXU vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) at 3.85%. This indicates that FXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXUGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

3.85%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

8.79%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

10.74%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

14.11%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.14%

+1.19%

FXU vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXU vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than GII's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
2.20%2.29%2.41%2.52%2.03%2.00%3.97%2.34%2.40%3.81%2.62%3.90%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.72%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXU and GII have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXU has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to GII (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 10-year performance, FXU leads with 9.21% vs 8.22% for GII. On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXU has performed better with a 9.21% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.20% for FXU.

FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.40% for GII.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXU and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer