FXR vs. RSPN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FXR (First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund) and RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - FXR tracks the StrataQuant Industrials Index while RSPN tracks the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXR returned 12.76%/yr vs 14.34%/yr for RSPN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXR charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPN.

Performance

FXR vs. RSPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than RSPN's 7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FXR has underperformed RSPN with an annualized return of 12.76%, while RSPN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.34% annualized return.

FXR

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 9.00%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 23.27%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

RSPN

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: 18.26%
• 3Y*: 18.45%
• 5Y*: 11.06%
• 10Y*: 14.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXR vs. RSPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund	9.00%	7.56%	16.19%	26.98%	-16.68%	25.07%	12.82%	33.42%	-15.12%	24.20%
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	7.91%	13.84%	17.63%	22.32%	-8.79%	26.07%	18.07%	33.17%	-13.23%	23.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FXR and RSPN is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.87

The correlation between FXR and RSPN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXR vs. RSPN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXR	RSPN
Industrials	70.5%	91.8%
Technology	10.3%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	2.5%
Basic Materials	6.2%	-
Financial Services	3.4%	0.0%
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.7%	1.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FXR vs. RSPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXR

FXR Risk / Return Rank: 34
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

RSPN

RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 32
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXR vs. RSPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXR	RSPN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.19	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	1.79	+0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.21	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	1.43	+0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	5.01	+0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXR vs. RSPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the RSPN Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXR and RSPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXR	RSPN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	1.19	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.61	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.71	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.53	-0.15

Drawdowns

FXR vs. RSPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, which is greater than RSPN's maximum drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and RSPN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXR	RSPN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.81%	-59.61%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-12.36%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.65%	-20.89%	-5.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.85%	-21.88%	-4.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.71%	-42.02%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-4.41%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.36%	-7.68%	-2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	3.53%	+0.73%

Volatility

FXR vs. RSPN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) at 4.40%. This indicates that FXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXR	RSPN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.83%	4.40%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	12.18%	+2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.98%	15.37%	+3.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	18.18%	+2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	20.36%	+1.56%

FXR vs. RSPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPN's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXR vs. RSPN - Dividend Comparison

FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than RSPN's 0.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund	0.62%	0.71%	0.72%	0.77%	0.92%	0.52%	1.06%	0.74%	1.18%	0.55%	0.52%	0.62%
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	0.81%	0.86%	0.98%	1.06%	1.09%	0.70%	0.96%	1.33%	1.49%	1.12%	1.31%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXR and RSPN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FXR and RSPN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FXR or RSPN?

FXR has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to RSPN (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs RSPN's -59.61%.

Which ETF is better, FXR or RSPN?

On 10-year performance, RSPN leads with 14.34% vs 12.76% for FXR. On fees, RSPN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPN has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXR or RSPN?

Over the 10-year period, RSPN has performed better with a 14.34% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXR or RSPN?

RSPN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXR or RSPN?

RSPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.62% for FXR.

What is the main difference between FXR and RSPN?

FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.40% for RSPN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.