FXR vs. FOWF
FXR (First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund) and FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - FXR tracks the StrataQuant Industrials Index while FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FXR returned 20.53% vs 22.10% for FOWF. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXR charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FOWF.
Performance
FXR vs. FOWF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than FOWF's 9.44% return.
FXR
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
FOWF
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXR vs. FOWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 8.45% | 7.56% | -0.72% |
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 9.44% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXR and FOWF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FXR and FOWF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXR vs. FOWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXR
FOWF
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
FXR
FOWF
Technology
FXR
FOWF
Consumer Cyclical
FXR
FOWF
Basic Materials
FXR
FOWF
Financial Services
FXR
FOWF
-
Healthcare
FXR
FOWF
-
Utilities
FXR
FOWF
-
Communication Services
FXR
-
FOWF
Consumer Defensive
FXR
-
FOWF
-
Energy
FXR
-
FOWF
-
Real Estate
FXR
-
FOWF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXR vs. FOWF — Risk / Return Rank
FXR
FOWF
FXR vs. FOWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXR | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.20 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 7.02 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXR | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.59 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.63 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
FXR vs. FOWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, which is greater than FOWF's maximum drawdown of -12.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and FOWF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXR | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.81% | -12.29% | -51.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | -10.08% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -2.81% | -2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.35% | -2.05% | -8.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 3.16% | +1.11% |
Volatility
FXR vs. FOWF - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) at 4.80%. This indicates that FXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXR | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 4.80% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.61% | 11.62% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 13.94% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 16.89% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 16.89% | +5.03% |
FXR vs. FOWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FOWF's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXR vs. FOWF - Dividend Comparison
FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FOWF's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 1.06% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXR and FOWF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to FOWF (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs FOWF's -12.29%.
On 1-year performance, FOWF leads with 22.10% vs 20.53% for FXR. On fees, FOWF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FOWF has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FOWF has performed better with a 22.10% return vs 20.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FOWF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.
FOWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.63% for FXR.
FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.49% for FOWF.
FOWF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXR and FOWF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer