PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FXP vs. PXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FXP vs. PXH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXP returned -23.04%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for PXH. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PXH.

Performance

FXP vs. PXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly lower than PXH's 14.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FXP has underperformed PXH with an annualized return of -23.04%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.

FXP

1D
4.65%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.64%
6M
16.82%
1Y
-6.43%
3Y*
-30.22%
5Y*
-16.52%
10Y*
-23.04%

PXH

1D
-1.63%
1M
3.38%
YTD
14.63%
6M
15.56%
1Y
36.41%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXP vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50		13.64%-45.32%-52.46%12.74%-11.73%23.56%-39.47%-29.01%12.45%-49.76%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF		14.63%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FXP and PXH is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007

-0.82

The correlation between FXP and PXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.84 to -0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50

Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

Often compared with FXP:
FXP vs. YXIFXP vs. FXIFXP vs. YANGFXP vs. KLIPFXP vs. FNILXFXP vs. RLBGXFXP vs. CQQQ
Often compared with PXH:
PXH vs. FNDEPXH vs. IEMGPXH vs. PXFPXH vs. DEMPXH vs. EEMPXH vs. VOOPXH vs. EEMO

Return for Risk

FXP vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FXP
FXP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXP vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FXPPXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.16
2.39

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.04
3.20

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.43

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

3.57

-3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

13.29

-13.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXP vs. PXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXP Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the PXH Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXP and PXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FXPPXHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

2.39

-2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.51

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.42

0.54

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.14

-0.58

Drawdowns

FXP vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than PXH's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and PXH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FXPPXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-63.63%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.21%

-10.24%

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.34%

-17.72%

-64.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.85%

-29.59%

-58.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.71%

-40.42%

-54.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

-1.63%

-98.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.15%

-16.86%

-77.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.66%

2.75%

+14.91%

Volatility

FXP vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) at 5.43%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FXPPXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

5.43%

+9.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

12.30%

+16.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.29%

15.31%

+23.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.12%

17.78%

+45.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.91%

20.07%

+34.84%

FXP vs. PXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PXH's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXP vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison

FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than PXH's 3.43% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50		4.12%9.57%3.55%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF		3.43%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

FXP and PXH have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXP has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to PXH (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs PXH's -63.63%.

On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.81% vs -23.04% for FXP. On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.81% return vs -23.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.

FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 3.43% for PXH.

FXP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PXH is Emerging Markets Equities. FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.50% for PXH.

PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXP and PXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer