FXP vs. BITU
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU).
FXP and BITU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). It was launched on Nov 8, 2007. BITU is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 1, 2024. Both FXP and BITU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FXP vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXP vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 11.77% | -45.32% | -47.92% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -47.12% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -47.12% return.
FXP
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 25.78%
- 1Y
- -12.70%
- 3Y*
- -27.68%
- 5Y*
- -16.72%
- 10Y*
- -23.48%
BITU
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- -47.12%
- 6M
- -71.69%
- 1Y
- -52.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXP vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FXP and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
BITU
FXP vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXP | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | -0.58 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | -0.51 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.94 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | -0.70 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | -1.35 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXP | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | -0.58 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | -0.33 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and BITU is -0.25. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FXP vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than BITU's 78.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 4.18% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 78.57% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXP vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and BITU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -77.76% | -22.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.42% | -77.76% | +25.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -76.35% | -23.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.10% | -31.27% | -62.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.47% | 40.22% | +2.25% |
Volatility
FXP vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) is 13.95%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.13%. This indicates that FXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 26.13% | -12.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.87% | 74.10% | -45.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.71% | 90.36% | -42.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.04% | 99.67% | -36.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.96% | 99.67% | -44.71% |