PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXN vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXN vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 25.36% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 23.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FXN has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 5.82%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.95% annualized return.


FXN

1D
0.10%
1M
-7.84%
YTD
25.36%
6M
25.74%
1Y
36.81%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
5.82%

GRID

1D
-4.46%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.40%
6M
22.11%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
19.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXN vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
25.36%3.39%0.27%0.97%46.92%51.79%-19.91%-6.76%-24.79%-5.02%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.40%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FXN and GRID is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between FXN and GRID has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXN vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXN
GRID

Energy

92.2%
1.6%

Technology

7.8%
12.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

24.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.9%

Energy

FXN
92.2%
GRID
1.6%

Technology

FXN
7.8%
GRID
12.5%

Basic Materials

FXN

-

GRID
0.0%

Communication Services

FXN

-

GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXN

-

GRID
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

FXN

-

GRID

-

Financial Services

FXN

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

FXN

-

GRID

-

Industrials

FXN

-

GRID
24.2%

Real Estate

FXN

-

GRID

-

Utilities

FXN

-

GRID
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXN vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXN
FXN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXN vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXNGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.63

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

12.92

-4.84

FXN vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXN and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXN vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-40.56%

-46.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-11.73%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.69%

-20.77%

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-29.64%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.63%

-40.56%

-40.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.26%

-5.55%

-5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.90%

-8.42%

-29.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

3.29%

+1.28%

Volatility

FXN vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) is 7.38%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that FXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXNGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

10.12%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.15%

18.23%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.85%

21.26%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.95%

21.37%

+7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.94%

22.80%

+12.14%

FXN vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXN vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
1.91%2.53%2.50%3.09%2.28%0.87%4.71%1.47%1.43%1.17%1.05%2.36%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXN and GRID have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to FXN (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.95% vs 5.82% for FXN. On fees, FXN is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FXN has been the lower-risk option at 7.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXN is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

FXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

FXN is categorized as Energy Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXN and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer