PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXN vs. BILD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FXN vs. BILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FXN vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
36.88%3.39%0.27%0.28%
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
8.96%21.08%-2.68%3.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 36.88% return, which is significantly higher than BILD's 8.96% return.


FXN

1D
-1.36%
1M
12.16%
YTD
36.88%
6M
39.23%
1Y
39.08%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
7.49%

BILD

1D
1.10%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
8.96%
6M
11.03%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FXN vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FXN vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXN
FXN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BILD
BILD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXN vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXNBILDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.07

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.70

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.25

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.59

14.07

-8.47

FXN vs. BILD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the BILD Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXN and BILD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXNBILDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.07

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

1.01

-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between FXN and BILD is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FXN vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison

FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than BILD's 2.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
1.75%2.53%2.50%3.09%2.28%0.87%4.71%1.47%1.43%1.17%1.05%2.36%
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
2.82%3.05%5.53%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FXN vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and BILD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNBILDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-14.78%

-72.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.10%

-8.09%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-3.51%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-3.75%

-34.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.28%

1.87%

+5.41%

Volatility

FXN vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) at 4.06%. This indicates that FXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FXNBILDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

4.06%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

7.36%

+8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.71%

12.65%

+19.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.06%

13.13%

+15.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.08%

13.13%

+21.95%