PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 19.60%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.63% annualized return.


FXL

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.51%
6M
17.90%
YTD
18.85%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
19.60%
ALL TIME*
13.00%

VTI

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.77%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.63%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.02M$18.35M$33.60M
$1.06B$1.16B$1.24B

FXL vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
18.85%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.49%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and VTI is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.83

The correlation between FXL and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
VTI

Technology

90.1%
36.1%

Communication Services

5.0%
9.1%

Industrials

3.6%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
9.4%

Financial Services

0.4%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

3.2%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

FXL
90.1%
VTI
36.1%

Communication Services

FXL
5.0%
VTI
9.1%

Industrials

FXL
3.6%
VTI
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
0.9%
VTI
9.4%

Financial Services

FXL
0.4%
VTI
11.8%

Basic Materials

FXL

-

VTI
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

VTI
4.3%

Energy

FXL

-

VTI
3.2%

Healthcare

FXL

-

VTI
9.7%

Real Estate

FXL

-

VTI
2.3%

Utilities

FXL

-

VTI
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.23

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.70

9.62

-4.92

FXL vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-55.45%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.21%

-8.92%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-19.30%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-25.36%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

-35.00%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.74%

-1.36%

-9.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-7.99%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

2.07%

+3.23%

Volatility

FXL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.46%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

3.46%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

10.24%

+11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

13.10%

+12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.76%

17.51%

+8.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

18.30%

+7.22%

FXL vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and VTI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXL has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to VTI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 19.60% vs 14.63% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 14.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer