FXL vs. VTI
FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Technology Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXL returned 21.15%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
FXL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 21.15%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.05% annualized return.
FXL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
FXL vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 31.98% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 40.50% | -30.44% | 18.20% | 54.20% | 38.66% | 2.72% | 35.82% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXL and VTI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FXL and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXL vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXL
VTI
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FXL
VTI
Communication Services
FXL
VTI
Industrials
FXL
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
FXL
VTI
Financial Services
FXL
VTI
Basic Materials
FXL
-
VTI
Consumer Defensive
FXL
-
VTI
Energy
FXL
-
VTI
Healthcare
FXL
-
VTI
Real Estate
FXL
-
VTI
Utilities
FXL
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXL vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FXL
VTI
FXL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXL | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 2.33 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.84 | 3.18 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.17 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | 14.62 | -2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXL | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.33 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.73 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.82 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.51 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
FXL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXL | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -55.45% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | -8.92% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -19.30% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | -25.36% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.49% | -35.00% | -3.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.72% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -8.03% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 1.93% | +2.10% |
Volatility
FXL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXL | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 2.96% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 9.13% | +8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 12.17% | +10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 17.40% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 18.30% | +6.98% |
FXL vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXL and VTI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 21.15% vs 15.05% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 15.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.
FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXL and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer