PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than RDVY's 15.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has outperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 19.83%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively lower 16.02% annualized return.


FXL

1D
-2.00%
1M
-3.96%
6M
16.27%
YTD
20.92%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
19.83%

RDVY

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.68%
6M
10.39%
YTD
15.31%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
16.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
20.92%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
15.31%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and RDVY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.72

The correlation between FXL and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
RDVY

Technology

89.9%
26.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
5.5%

Industrials

3.7%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
10.9%

Financial Services

0.5%
33.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

3.4%

Energy

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

3.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

FXL
89.9%
RDVY
26.9%

Communication Services

FXL
5.2%
RDVY
5.5%

Industrials

FXL
3.7%
RDVY
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
0.8%
RDVY
10.9%

Financial Services

FXL
0.5%
RDVY
33.5%

Basic Materials

FXL

-

RDVY

-

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

RDVY
3.4%

Energy

FXL

-

RDVY
2.4%

Healthcare

FXL

-

RDVY
3.9%

Real Estate

FXL

-

RDVY

-

Utilities

FXL

-

RDVY
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.03

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

12.68

-5.96

FXL vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXL vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-40.60%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-9.04%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-19.11%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-25.32%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

-40.60%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.19%

-1.62%

-7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-4.97%

-6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

2.15%

+2.41%

Volatility

FXL vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 4.81%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

4.81%

+5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

11.59%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.05%

14.67%

+10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.66%

18.96%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.46%

21.03%

+4.43%

FXL vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.85%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and RDVY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXL has higher volatility (9.85%) compared to RDVY (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 19.83% vs 16.02% for RDVY. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 19.83% return vs 16.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer