PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FXL having a 23.68% return and GRID slightly lower at 23.03%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXL having a 20.78% annualized return and GRID not far behind at 19.91%.


FXL

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.94%
YTD
23.68%
6M
21.04%
1Y
34.37%
3Y*
23.68%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
20.78%

GRID

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
23.03%
6M
21.65%
1Y
39.31%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
16.47%
10Y*
19.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
23.68%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.03%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and GRID is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.67

The correlation between FXL and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXL vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
GRID

Technology

88.5%
12.5%

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Industrials

3.8%
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
2.3%

Financial Services

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

FXL
88.5%
GRID
12.5%

Communication Services

FXL
4.8%
GRID

-

Industrials

FXL
3.8%
GRID
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
GRID
2.3%

Financial Services

FXL
1.0%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

FXL

-

GRID
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

GRID

-

Energy

FXL

-

GRID
1.6%

Healthcare

FXL

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

FXL

-

GRID

-

Utilities

FXL

-

GRID
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.37

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

11.90

-3.87

FXL vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXL vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-40.56%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-11.73%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-20.77%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-29.64%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

-40.56%

+2.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-5.83%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-8.42%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

3.31%

+0.98%

Volatility

FXL vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) at 10.09%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.69%

10.09%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.54%

18.22%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.23%

21.25%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.48%

21.36%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

22.79%

+2.63%

FXL vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and GRID have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXL has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to GRID (10.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 20.78% vs 19.91% for GRID. On fees, FXL is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 10.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 20.78% return vs 19.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXL is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer