PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXI vs. FLCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXI vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.18% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -6.30% return.


FXI

1D
-2.26%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-7.18%
6M
-8.38%
1Y
2.05%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
-3.18%
10Y*
2.96%

FLCH

1D
-1.68%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
-6.30%
6M
-7.45%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
-4.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXI vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-7.18%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%1.37%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-6.30%32.55%18.00%-11.21%-22.74%-20.87%30.09%24.32%-19.52%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FXI and FLCH is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.96

The correlation between FXI and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXI vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXI
FLCH

Financial Services

34.4%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

25.7%
23.4%

Communication Services

12.2%
14.2%

Technology

9.3%
12.9%

Energy

5.2%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.1%
5.5%

Industrials

3.8%
9.1%

Healthcare

2.2%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
3.3%

Utilities

0.4%
2.0%

Financial Services

FXI
34.4%
FLCH
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FXI
25.7%
FLCH
23.4%

Communication Services

FXI
12.2%
FLCH
14.2%

Technology

FXI
9.3%
FLCH
12.9%

Energy

FXI
5.2%
FLCH
3.7%

Basic Materials

FXI
4.1%
FLCH
5.5%

Industrials

FXI
3.8%
FLCH
9.1%

Healthcare

FXI
2.2%
FLCH
5.3%

Real Estate

FXI
1.1%
FLCH
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

FXI
0.9%
FLCH
3.3%

Utilities

FXI
0.4%
FLCH
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXI vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXI vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXIFLCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.09

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.54

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

1.14

-0.85

FXI vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXI and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXIFLCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.44

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

-0.17

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.02

+0.15

Drawdowns

FXI vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and FLCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXIFLCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

-62.09%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-15.52%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-25.43%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.94%

-55.78%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.91%

-33.95%

+7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-30.53%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

7.38%

-0.16%

Volatility

FXI vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.59%. This indicates that FXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXIFLCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

6.59%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.35%

13.67%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

19.22%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

29.59%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

27.91%

-0.24%

FXI vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXI vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than FLCH's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
2.52%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%0.00%0.00%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
2.60%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FXI and FLCH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXI has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to FLCH (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

On 5-year performance, FXI leads with -3.18% vs -4.93% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FXI has performed better with a -3.18% return vs -4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.52% for FLCH.

FXI tracks FTSE China 25 Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.19% for FLCH.

FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXI and FLCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer