FXI vs. FLCH
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - FXI tracks the FTSE China 25 Index while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXI returned -3.18%/yr vs -4.93%/yr for FLCH. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
FXI vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.18% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -6.30% return.
FXI
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- -3.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
FLCH
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.18% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 1.37% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.30% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and FLCH is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FXI and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXI vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
FLCH
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
FXI
FLCH
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
FLCH
Communication Services
FXI
FLCH
Technology
FXI
FLCH
Energy
FXI
FLCH
Basic Materials
FXI
FLCH
Industrials
FXI
FLCH
Healthcare
FXI
FLCH
Real Estate
FXI
FLCH
Consumer Defensive
FXI
FLCH
Utilities
FXI
FLCH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
FLCH
FXI vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.09 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.54 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 1.14 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.44 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | -0.17 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.02 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
FXI vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -62.09% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -15.52% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -25.43% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -55.78% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.91% | -33.95% | +7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -30.53% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 7.38% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FXI vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.59%. This indicates that FXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 6.59% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 13.67% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 19.22% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 29.59% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 27.91% | -0.24% |
FXI vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than FLCH's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.52% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.60% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FXI and FLCH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FXI has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to FLCH (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
On 5-year performance, FXI leads with -3.18% vs -4.93% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXI has performed better with a -3.18% return vs -4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.52% for FLCH.
FXI tracks FTSE China 25 Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.19% for FLCH.
FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer