PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXI vs. CN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXI vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FXI

1D
-1.79%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
-13.61%
6M
-14.15%
1Y
-7.33%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
-4.39%
10Y*
2.55%

CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXI vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-13.61%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FXI and CN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2014

0.77

The correlation between FXI and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXI vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXI
CN

Financial Services

34.8%
55.1%

Consumer Cyclical

26.4%
5.4%

Communication Services

16.3%
0.4%

Technology

5.4%
0.3%

Energy

5.3%
0.9%

Basic Materials

3.9%
0.6%

Industrials

3.2%
1.0%

Healthcare

2.3%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
0.3%

Utilities

0.4%
0.2%

Financial Services

FXI
34.8%
CN
55.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FXI
26.4%
CN
5.4%

Communication Services

FXI
16.3%
CN
0.4%

Technology

FXI
5.4%
CN
0.3%

Energy

FXI
5.3%
CN
0.9%

Basic Materials

FXI
3.9%
CN
0.6%

Industrials

FXI
3.2%
CN
1.0%

Healthcare

FXI
2.3%
CN
0.8%

Real Estate

FXI
1.1%
CN
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

FXI
0.9%
CN
0.3%

Utilities

FXI
0.4%
CN
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXI vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXI vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXICNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

FXI vs. CN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXI vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXICNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.13%

Volatility

FXI vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXICNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.60%

FXI vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXI vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
2.07%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXI and CN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.50% for CN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXI and CN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer