PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXH vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXH vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 18.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FXH has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 7.76%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.08% annualized return.


FXH

1D
0.72%
1M
1.42%
6M
11.87%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
7.76%
ALL TIME*
10.27%

RDVY

1D
0.81%
1M
2.01%
6M
12.29%
YTD
18.21%
1Y
31.80%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
16.08%
ALL TIME*
13.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.23M$7.53M$5.49M
$79.27M$78.43M$84.11M

FXH vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
12.75%10.16%0.96%-4.53%-12.24%15.20%28.00%22.26%-1.33%21.82%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
18.21%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FXH and RDVY is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.64

The correlation between FXH and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXH vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXH
RDVY

Healthcare

97.3%
5.6%

Technology

1.4%
19.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.8%

Energy

-

2.8%

Financial Services

-

38.9%

Industrials

-

12.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.4%

Healthcare

FXH
97.3%
RDVY
5.6%

Technology

FXH
1.4%
RDVY
19.4%

Basic Materials

FXH

-

RDVY

-

Communication Services

FXH

-

RDVY
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FXH

-

RDVY
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

FXH

-

RDVY
2.8%

Energy

FXH

-

RDVY
2.8%

Financial Services

FXH

-

RDVY
38.9%

Industrials

FXH

-

RDVY
12.5%

Real Estate

FXH

-

RDVY

-

Utilities

FXH

-

RDVY
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXH vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXH
FXH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXH vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXHRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.54

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

14.83

-6.86

FXH vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXH and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXH vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXHRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-40.60%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-9.04%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-19.11%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

-25.32%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

-40.60%

+9.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-4.95%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

2.15%

+1.74%

Volatility

FXH vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.55%. This indicates that FXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXHRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

3.55%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

11.40%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

14.64%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

18.93%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.51%

21.03%

-2.52%

FXH vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXH vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.80%0.75%0.41%0.24%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXH and RDVY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXH has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to RDVY (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.08% vs 7.76% for FXH. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.08% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.80% for FXH.

FXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXH and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer