FXH vs. FXG
FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) and FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Health Care Index, while FXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXH returned 7.03%/yr vs 4.23%/yr for FXG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXH charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FXG.
Performance
FXH vs. FXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than FXG's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FXH has outperformed FXG with an annualized return of 7.03%, while FXG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.
FXH
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
FXG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- -2.29%
- 3Y*
- 0.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.23%
FXH vs. FXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.68% | 10.16% | 0.96% | -4.53% | -12.24% | 15.20% | 28.00% | 22.26% | -1.33% | 21.82% |
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | -0.18% | -2.66% | 3.21% | 1.97% | 3.28% | 21.73% | 4.85% | 20.65% | -11.49% | 7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXH and FXG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FXH and FXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXH vs. FXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXH
FXG
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FXH
FXG
Basic Materials
FXH
-
FXG
Communication Services
FXH
-
FXG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXH
-
FXG
Consumer Defensive
FXH
-
FXG
Energy
FXH
-
FXG
-
Financial Services
FXH
-
FXG
-
Industrials
FXH
-
FXG
Real Estate
FXH
-
FXG
-
Technology
FXH
-
FXG
-
Utilities
FXH
-
FXG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXH vs. FXG — Risk / Return Rank
FXH
FXG
FXH vs. FXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXH | FXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | -0.18 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | -0.42 | +3.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXH | FXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | -0.18 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.14 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.28 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.47 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FXH vs. FXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than FXG's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and FXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXH | FXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -38.69% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -12.75% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.53% | -12.75% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.49% | -15.70% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.61% | -27.54% | -3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.07% | -12.70% | +3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -6.03% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 5.41% | -1.42% |
Volatility
FXH vs. FXG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) at 3.20%. This indicates that FXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXH | FXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.20% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 9.11% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 12.71% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 13.48% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 14.92% | +3.55% |
FXH vs. FXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FXG's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXH vs. FXG - Dividend Comparison
FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than FXG's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.90% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.85% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXH and FXG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXH has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to FXG (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs FXG's -38.69%.
On 10-year performance, FXH leads with 7.03% vs 4.23% for FXG. On fees, FXH is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXH has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXH is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.85% for FXH.
FXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while FXG is Consumer Staples Equities. FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.63% for FXG.
FXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXH and FXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer