FXH vs. FXG
FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) and FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Health Care Index, while FXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXH returned 7.47%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for FXG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXH charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FXG.
Performance
FXH vs. FXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly higher than FXG's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FXH has outperformed FXG with an annualized return of 7.47%, while FXG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.
FXH
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
FXG
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
FXH vs. FXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 7.37% | 10.16% | 0.96% | -4.53% | -12.24% | 15.20% | 28.00% | 22.26% | -1.33% | 21.82% |
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 5.56% | -2.66% | 3.21% | 1.97% | 3.28% | 21.73% | 4.85% | 20.65% | -11.49% | 7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXH and FXG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FXH and FXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXH vs. FXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXH
FXG
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FXH
FXG
Basic Materials
FXH
-
FXG
Communication Services
FXH
-
FXG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXH
-
FXG
Consumer Defensive
FXH
-
FXG
Energy
FXH
-
FXG
-
Financial Services
FXH
-
FXG
-
Industrials
FXH
-
FXG
Real Estate
FXH
-
FXG
-
Technology
FXH
-
FXG
-
Utilities
FXH
-
FXG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXH vs. FXG — Risk / Return Rank
FXH
FXG
FXH vs. FXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXH | FXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.04 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 0.18 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 0.38 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXH vs. FXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than FXG's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and FXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXH | FXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -38.69% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -12.75% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.53% | -12.75% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.49% | -15.70% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.61% | -27.54% | -3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -7.67% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -6.04% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 6.14% | -2.24% |
Volatility
FXH vs. FXG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) is 5.06%, while First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that FXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXH | FXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 5.47% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 10.30% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 13.71% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 13.67% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 14.98% | +3.50% |
FXH vs. FXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FXG's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXH vs. FXG - Dividend Comparison
FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FXG's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.41% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.84% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXH and FXG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXG has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to FXH (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs FXG's -38.69%.
On 10-year performance, FXH leads with 7.47% vs 4.43% for FXG. On fees, FXH is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXH has performed better with a 7.47% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXH is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.84% for FXH.
FXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while FXG is Consumer Staples Equities. FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.63% for FXG.
FXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXH and FXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer