FXH vs. CANC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) and CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. FXH is passively managed, while CANC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FXH returned 3.52%/yr vs 107.76%/yr for CANC. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXH charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CANC.

Performance

FXH vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than CANC's 4.82% return.

FXH

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 3.52%
• 5Y*: 0.56%
• 10Y*: 7.03%

CANC

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -3.73%
• YTD: 4.82%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 47.37%
• 3Y*: 107.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXH vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund	0.68%	10.16%	0.96%	-4.53%	-12.24%	4.30%
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	4.82%	42.92%	-5.37%	510.51%	-85.34%	-51.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FXH and CANC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.45

The correlation between FXH and CANC shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.63 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXH vs. CANC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXH	CANC
Healthcare	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FXH vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXH

FXH Risk / Return Rank: 24
FXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FXH Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FXH Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CANC

CANC Risk / Return Rank: 69
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXH vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXH	CANC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.06	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	2.96	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	5.49	-4.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.33	14.62	-11.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXH vs. CANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXH Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the CANC Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXH and CANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXH	CANC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	2.06	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	-0.04	+0.55

Drawdowns

FXH vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and CANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXH	CANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.70%	-97.53%	+53.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.20%	-8.67%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.53%	-30.27%	+12.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.07%	-56.55%	+47.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.46%	-73.19%	+63.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	3.25%	+0.74%

Volatility

FXH vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) is 4.16%, while Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that FXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXH	CANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	6.26%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	16.69%	-5.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.75%	23.11%	-7.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	280.27%	-263.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.47%	280.27%	-261.80%

FXH vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXH vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than CANC's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	0.05%	0.06%	3.00%	0.56%	0.00%
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund	0.85%	0.75%	0.41%	0.24%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXH and CANC in my portfolio?

FXH and CANC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXH or CANC?

CANC has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to FXH (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs CANC's -97.53%.

Which ETF is better, FXH or CANC?

On 3-year performance, CANC leads with 107.76% vs 3.52% for FXH. On fees, FXH is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXH or CANC?

Over the 3-year period, CANC has performed better with a 107.76% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXH or CANC?

FXH is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CANC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXH or CANC?

FXH has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.05% for CANC.

What is the main difference between FXH and CANC?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.75% for CANC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.