FXH vs. BNO
FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Health Care Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXH returned 7.03%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXH charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
FXH vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FXH has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 7.03%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.
FXH
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
FXH vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.68% | 10.16% | 0.96% | -4.53% | -12.24% | 15.20% | 28.00% | 22.26% | -1.33% | 21.82% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | 36.01% | -15.30% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXH and BNO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010 | 0.14 |
The correlation between FXH and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXH vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
FXH
BNO
FXH vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXH | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 5.17 | -4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 9.76 | -6.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXH | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 2.23 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.69 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.37 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.14 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
FXH vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXH | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -87.06% | +43.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -17.87% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.53% | -23.75% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.49% | -33.70% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.61% | -75.18% | +44.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.07% | -10.29% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -40.17% | +30.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 9.45% | -5.46% |
Volatility
FXH vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) is 4.16%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that FXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXH | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 14.22% | -10.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 36.10% | -24.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 41.46% | -25.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 35.38% | -18.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 36.68% | -18.21% |
FXH vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXH vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.85% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXH and BNO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to FXH (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.60% vs 7.03% for FXH. On fees, FXH is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXH is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
FXH has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
FXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.90% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXH and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer