FXG vs. FXH
FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while FXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXG returned 4.40%/yr vs 7.54%/yr for FXH. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FXH.
Performance
FXG vs. FXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than FXH's 8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FXG has underperformed FXH with an annualized return of 4.40%, while FXH has yielded a comparatively higher 7.54% annualized return.
FXG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
FXH
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
FXG vs. FXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 5.31% | -2.66% | 3.21% | 1.97% | 3.28% | 21.73% | 4.85% | 20.65% | -11.49% | 7.87% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 8.03% | 10.16% | 0.96% | -4.53% | -12.24% | 15.20% | 28.00% | 22.26% | -1.33% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXG and FXH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FXG and FXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXG vs. FXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXG
FXH
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FXG
FXH
-
Healthcare
FXG
FXH
Consumer Cyclical
FXG
FXH
-
Industrials
FXG
FXH
-
Basic Materials
FXG
FXH
-
Communication Services
FXG
-
FXH
-
Energy
FXG
-
FXH
-
Financial Services
FXG
-
FXH
-
Real Estate
FXG
-
FXH
-
Technology
FXG
-
FXH
-
Utilities
FXG
-
FXH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXG vs. FXH — Risk / Return Rank
FXG
FXH
FXG vs. FXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXG | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.25 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 1.92 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 5.99 | -5.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXG vs. FXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum FXH drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and FXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXG | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -43.70% | +5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -12.20% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | -17.53% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.70% | -29.49% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.54% | -30.61% | +3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -3.24% | -4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -9.43% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 3.89% | +2.27% |
Volatility
FXG vs. FXH - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) at 5.08%. This indicates that FXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXG | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 5.08% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 11.85% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 16.42% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 16.67% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 18.47% | -3.49% |
FXG vs. FXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FXH's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXG vs. FXH - Dividend Comparison
FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than FXH's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.42% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.84% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXG and FXH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXG has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FXH (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs FXH's -43.70%.
On 10-year performance, FXH leads with 7.54% vs 4.40% for FXG. On fees, FXH is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXH has performed better with a 7.54% return vs 4.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXH is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.84% for FXH.
FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FXH is Health & Biotech Equities. FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.61% for FXH.
FXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXG and FXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer