PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXG vs. FAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXG vs. FAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 27.58% return.


FXG

1D
2.07%
1M
1.23%
YTD
2.89%
6M
2.89%
1Y
-0.88%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
4.68%

FAI

1D
-4.82%
1M
1.99%
YTD
27.58%
6M
26.62%
1Y
56.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXG vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FXG and FAI is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXG vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXG
FXG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXG vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXGFAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.35

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

3.02

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

9.38

-9.53

FXG vs. FAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXG Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the FAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXG and FAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXG vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than FAI's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and FAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXGFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-27.82%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-18.84%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.01%

-9.38%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-5.37%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

6.06%

-0.19%

Volatility

FXG vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is 5.33%, while First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that FXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXGFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

14.67%

-9.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

22.72%

-12.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

27.43%

-14.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

31.12%

-17.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

31.12%

-16.15%

FXG vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXG vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison

FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
2.82%2.83%1.70%1.41%1.83%1.38%1.41%1.63%2.31%1.34%1.72%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXG and FAI have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAI has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to FXG (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs FAI's -27.82%.

On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 56.66% vs -0.88% for FXG. On fees, FXG is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 56.66% return vs -0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXG is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FAI is Technology Equities. FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.65% for FAI.

FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXG and FAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer