FXG vs. ATFV
FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while ATFV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXG returned 1.87%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for ATFV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ATFV.
Performance
FXG vs. ATFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than ATFV's 16.46% return.
FXG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- -2.29%
- 3Y*
- 0.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.23%
ATFV
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 16.46%
- 6M
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- 48.62%
- 3Y*
- 39.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.56%
- 10Y*
- —
FXG vs. ATFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | -0.18% | -2.66% | 3.21% | 1.97% | 3.28% | 6.87% |
ATFV Alger 35 ETF | 16.46% | 38.20% | 46.14% | 32.75% | -35.97% | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXG and ATFV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between FXG and ATFV shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXG vs. ATFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXG
ATFV
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FXG
ATFV
-
Healthcare
FXG
ATFV
Consumer Cyclical
FXG
ATFV
Industrials
FXG
ATFV
Basic Materials
FXG
ATFV
-
Communication Services
FXG
-
ATFV
Energy
FXG
-
ATFV
-
Financial Services
FXG
-
ATFV
Real Estate
FXG
-
ATFV
-
Technology
FXG
-
ATFV
Utilities
FXG
-
ATFV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXG vs. ATFV — Risk / Return Rank
FXG
ATFV
FXG vs. ATFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXG | ATFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.35 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 2.67 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 9.15 | -9.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXG | ATFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 2.12 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.59 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
FXG vs. ATFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum ATFV drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and ATFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXG | ATFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -45.34% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -18.29% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | -29.01% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.70% | -45.34% | +29.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -2.72% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -17.81% | +11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 5.33% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FXG vs. ATFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is 3.20%, while Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that FXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXG | ATFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 7.65% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 17.34% | -8.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 23.00% | -10.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 26.62% | -13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 26.55% | -11.63% |
FXG vs. ATFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ATFV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXG vs. ATFV - Dividend Comparison
FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than ATFV's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATFV Alger 35 ETF | 0.17% | 0.20% | 0.16% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.90% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXG and ATFV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATFV has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to FXG (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs ATFV's -45.34%.
On 5-year performance, ATFV leads with 15.56% vs 1.87% for FXG. On fees, ATFV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ATFV has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ATFV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.17% for ATFV.
FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ATFV is Large Cap Growth Equities. FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while ATFV tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Alger Group Holdings LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.55% for ATFV.
ATFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXG and ATFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer