FXED vs. EAOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXED (Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF) and EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. FXED is actively managed, while EAOM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXED returned 2.33%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for EAOM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXED charges 2.33%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOM.

Performance

FXED vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXED achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than EAOM's 5.08% return.

FXED

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: -0.68%
• 6M: -0.29%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: 6.64%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: —

EAOM

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 5.08%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 14.66%
• 3Y*: 10.47%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXED vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FXED Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF	-0.68%	5.77%	5.18%	15.09%	-14.68%	9.75%
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	5.08%	12.90%	7.29%	11.83%	-15.48%	6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FXED and EAOM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021	0.56

The correlation between FXED and EAOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXED vs. EAOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXED	EAOM
Financial Services	61.2%	16.6%
Real Estate	38.8%	2.3%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Communication Services	-	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Energy	-	3.8%
Healthcare	-	8.6%
Industrials	-	11.0%
Technology	-	30.2%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

FXED vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXED

FXED Risk / Return Rank: 18
FXED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FXED Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FXED Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FXED Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FXED Martin Ratio Rank: 19

EAOM

EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXED vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXED	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	2.29	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	3.31	-2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.43	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.85	-2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	12.53	-10.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXED vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXED Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXED and EAOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXED	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	2.29	-1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.53	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.76	-0.37

Drawdowns

FXED vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXED drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, roughly equal to the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXED and EAOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXED	EAOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-20.73%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.36%	-5.17%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.96%	-7.63%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.70%	-20.73%	+1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-0.45%	-2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-4.97%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.17%	+0.80%

Volatility

FXED vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) is 2.12%, while iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that FXED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXED	EAOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	2.31%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.21%	5.24%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.79%	6.44%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.75%	8.07%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.59%	7.91%	+0.68%

FXED vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXED has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXED vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

FXED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than EAOM's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	2.78%	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	1.93%	1.32%	1.02%
FXED Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF	7.16%	6.96%	6.70%	5.65%	5.94%	4.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXED and EAOM in my portfolio?

FXED and EAOM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXED or EAOM?

EAOM has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to FXED (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXED dropped -19.70% vs EAOM's -20.73%.

Which ETF is better, FXED or EAOM?

On 5-year performance, EAOM leads with 4.28% vs 2.33% for FXED. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FXED has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXED or EAOM?

Over the 5-year period, EAOM has performed better with a 4.28% return vs 2.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXED or EAOM?

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 2.33% for FXED.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXED or EAOM?

FXED has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 2.78% for EAOM.

What is the main difference between FXED and EAOM?

They also come from different issuers: Sound Income Strategies and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.33% for FXED and 0.18% for EAOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.