FXED vs. MFUL
FXED (Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FXED returned 6.64%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for MFUL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXED charges 2.33%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.
Performance
FXED vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXED achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than MFUL's 3.28% return.
FXED
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- 7.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXED vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXED Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF | -0.68% | 5.77% | 5.18% | 15.09% | -14.68% | 0.63% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.28% | 4.51% | 5.36% | 2.24% | -12.46% | -1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXED and MFUL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021 | 0.45 |
FXED vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXED
MFUL
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FXED
MFUL
Real Estate
FXED
MFUL
Basic Materials
FXED
-
MFUL
Communication Services
FXED
-
MFUL
Consumer Cyclical
FXED
-
MFUL
Consumer Defensive
FXED
-
MFUL
Energy
FXED
-
MFUL
Healthcare
FXED
-
MFUL
Industrials
FXED
-
MFUL
Technology
FXED
-
MFUL
Utilities
FXED
-
MFUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXED vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank
FXED
MFUL
FXED vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXED | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.35 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 2.13 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 8.24 | -6.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXED | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.82 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.01 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
FXED vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXED drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXED and MFUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXED | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -16.41% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.36% | -3.36% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.96% | -4.74% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -0.46% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -9.50% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 0.87% | +1.10% |
Volatility
FXED vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison
Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.46%. This indicates that FXED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXED | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 1.46% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | 3.23% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.79% | 3.93% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.75% | 4.24% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.59% | 4.24% | +4.35% |
FXED vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXED has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXED vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison
FXED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than MFUL's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXED Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF | 7.16% | 6.96% | 6.70% | 5.65% | 5.94% | 4.59% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.01% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXED and MFUL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXED has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to MFUL (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXED dropped -19.70% vs MFUL's -16.41%.
On 3-year performance, FXED leads with 6.64% vs 4.96% for MFUL. On fees, MFUL is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FXED has performed better with a 6.64% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUL is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 2.33% for FXED.
FXED has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 3.01% for MFUL.
They also come from different issuers: Sound Income Strategies and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.33% for FXED and 1.10% for MFUL.
MFUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXED and MFUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer