PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXD vs. ROBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXD vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 14.22% return.


FXD

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.79%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
7.89%

ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXD vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
-1.88%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-12.06%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-13.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FXD and ROBT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018

0.76

The correlation between FXD and ROBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXD vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXD
ROBT

Consumer Cyclical

69.7%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
1.4%

Industrials

9.2%
20.4%

Communication Services

6.7%
4.1%

Technology

2.5%
57.0%

Energy

0.8%
1.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

7.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXD
69.7%
ROBT
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

FXD
9.2%
ROBT
1.4%

Industrials

FXD
9.2%
ROBT
20.4%

Communication Services

FXD
6.7%
ROBT
4.1%

Technology

FXD
2.5%
ROBT
57.0%

Energy

FXD
0.8%
ROBT
1.5%

Basic Materials

FXD

-

ROBT

-

Financial Services

FXD

-

ROBT
1.6%

Healthcare

FXD

-

ROBT
7.4%

Real Estate

FXD

-

ROBT

-

Utilities

FXD

-

ROBT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXD vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXD vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXDROBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.22

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.42

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

4.09

-2.44

FXD vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXD and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXDROBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

1.32

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.09

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Drawdowns

FXD vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than ROBT's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and ROBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXDROBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-44.47%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-21.66%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

-27.68%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

-43.26%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

-1.73%

-5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-15.97%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

7.53%

-2.05%

Volatility

FXD vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) is 6.00%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that FXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXDROBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

6.46%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

17.51%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

23.32%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.70%

25.18%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

25.48%

-1.81%

FXD vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXD vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXD and ROBT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to FXD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

On 5-year performance, FXD leads with 3.00% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, FXD is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXD has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FXD has performed better with a 3.00% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXD is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.

FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

FXD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.65% for ROBT.

ROBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXD and ROBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer