PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXD vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXD vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 17.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 8.08%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.38% annualized return.


FXD

1D
-1.15%
1M
0.45%
6M
1.98%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
10.49%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
8.08%
ALL TIME*
7.56%

GRID

1D
1.53%
1M
-2.62%
6M
9.29%
YTD
17.75%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
18.38%
ALL TIME*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.22M$850.69K$681.18K
$98.53M$102.24M$137.97M

FXD vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
2.67%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-11.60%19.77%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
17.75%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FXD and GRID is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between FXD and GRID has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXD vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXD
GRID

Consumer Cyclical

68.1%
2.4%

Industrials

8.8%
23.6%

Communication Services

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.1%

-

Technology

5.3%
12.6%

Energy

0.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FXD
68.1%
GRID
2.4%

Industrials

FXD
8.8%
GRID
23.6%

Communication Services

FXD
8.0%
GRID

-

Consumer Defensive

FXD
7.1%
GRID

-

Technology

FXD
5.3%
GRID
12.6%

Energy

FXD
0.9%
GRID
1.6%

Basic Materials

FXD

-

GRID
0.8%

Financial Services

FXD

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

FXD

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

FXD

-

GRID

-

Utilities

FXD

-

GRID
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXD vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXD vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXDGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.22

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.73

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

6.17

-4.59

FXD vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXD and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXD vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXDGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-40.56%

-24.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-15.82%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

-20.62%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

-29.64%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-40.56%

-8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-9.87%

+7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

-8.42%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

4.42%

+1.28%

Volatility

FXD vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) is 5.98%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that FXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXDGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

8.92%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.29%

20.34%

-5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

23.07%

-3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

21.71%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

22.81%

+0.91%

FXD vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXD vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.60%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXD and GRID have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to FXD (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 18.38% vs 8.08% for FXD. On fees, FXD is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXD has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 18.38% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXD is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.60% for FXD.

FXD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while GRID is Infrastructure Equities. FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXD and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer