PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXD vs. CARZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXD vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 31.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed CARZ with an annualized return of 8.08%, while CARZ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.


FXD

1D
-1.15%
1M
0.45%
6M
1.98%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
10.49%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
8.08%
ALL TIME*
7.56%

CARZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
-7.17%
6M
20.80%
YTD
31.11%
1Y
66.56%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
14.32%
ALL TIME*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$535.60K$505.64K$494.01K
$1.22M$850.69K$681.18K

FXD vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
2.67%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-11.60%19.77%
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
31.11%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FXD and CARZ is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2011

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FXD and CARZ has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXD vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXD
CARZ

Consumer Cyclical

68.1%
16.3%

Industrials

8.8%
6.4%

Communication Services

8.0%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%

-

Technology

5.3%
69.1%

Energy

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXD
68.1%
CARZ
16.3%

Industrials

FXD
8.8%
CARZ
6.4%

Communication Services

FXD
8.0%
CARZ
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

FXD
7.1%
CARZ

-

Technology

FXD
5.3%
CARZ
69.1%

Energy

FXD
0.9%
CARZ

-

Basic Materials

FXD

-

CARZ
4.2%

Financial Services

FXD

-

CARZ

-

Healthcare

FXD

-

CARZ

-

Real Estate

FXD

-

CARZ

-

Utilities

FXD

-

CARZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXD vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXD vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXDCARZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.98

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

10.94

-9.36

FXD vs. CARZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the CARZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXD and CARZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXD vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than CARZ's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and CARZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXDCARZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-51.20%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-21.44%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

-27.84%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

-40.30%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-51.20%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-17.07%

+14.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

-12.87%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

5.83%

-0.13%

Volatility

FXD vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) is 5.98%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that FXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXDCARZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

12.06%

-6.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.29%

27.80%

-12.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

31.88%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

29.28%

-6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

26.77%

-3.05%

FXD vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXD vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than CARZ's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.34%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.60%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXD and CARZ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to FXD (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs CARZ's -51.20%.

On 10-year performance, CARZ leads with 14.32% vs 8.08% for FXD. On fees, FXD is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXD has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXD is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.60% for FXD.

FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXD and CARZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer