FWRLX vs. FSTCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX).
FWRLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 20, 2000. FSTCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985.
Performance
FWRLX vs. FSTCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWRLX vs. FSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio | 3.19% | 2.20% | 17.12% | 25.97% | -27.86% | 12.15% | 33.39% | 40.17% | -6.37% | 24.87% |
FSTCX Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio | 11.69% | 11.63% | 21.18% | 7.29% | -16.99% | -2.69% | 20.63% | 20.43% | -8.03% | 1.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWRLX achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than FSTCX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX has outperformed FSTCX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while FSTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return.
FWRLX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- -2.77%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
FSTCX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 15.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWRLX vs. FSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWRLX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTCX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWRLX vs. FSTCX — Risk / Return Rank
FWRLX
FSTCX
FWRLX vs. FSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWRLX | FSTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.88 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.52 | 1.28 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.46 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 4.08 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWRLX | FSTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.88 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.28 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.39 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.45 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRLX and FSTCX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWRLX vs. FSTCX - Dividend Comparison
FWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than FSTCX's 2.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio | 6.38% | 6.59% | 9.06% | 2.38% | 9.26% | 7.53% | 6.95% | 2.74% | 16.03% | 3.57% | 6.57% | 7.21% |
FSTCX Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio | 2.30% | 2.57% | 2.19% | 3.72% | 8.13% | 15.37% | 8.11% | 3.33% | 3.23% | 19.90% | 6.40% | 1.99% |
Drawdowns
FWRLX vs. FSTCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRLX drawdown since its inception was -79.37%, roughly equal to the maximum FSTCX drawdown of -82.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRLX and FSTCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRLX | FSTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.37% | -82.81% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -9.38% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -34.08% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.01% | -34.08% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.17% | -3.81% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.54% | -24.74% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 3.36% | +0.13% |
Volatility
FWRLX vs. FSTCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) is 4.68%, while Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that FWRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWRLX | FSTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 5.95% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 12.52% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 17.50% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 17.46% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 17.87% | +0.27% |