FWRLX vs. FBMPX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FWRLX (Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio) and FBMPX (Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio) are both Communications Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX returned 14.32%/yr vs 17.26%/yr for FBMPX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWRLX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FBMPX.

Performance

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRLX achieves a 34.20% return, which is significantly higher than FBMPX's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX has underperformed FBMPX with an annualized return of 14.32%, while FBMPX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.

FWRLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10.63%
• YTD: 34.20%
• 6M: 26.94%
• 1Y: 37.67%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 14.32%

FBMPX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 6M: 12.64%
• 1Y: 41.10%
• 3Y*: 34.92%
• 5Y*: 14.37%
• 10Y*: 17.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio	34.20%	2.20%	17.12%	25.97%	-27.86%	12.15%	33.39%	40.17%	-6.37%	24.87%
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	10.75%	37.07%	35.98%	56.85%	-38.30%	15.97%	35.48%	33.14%	-3.52%	12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRLX and FBMPX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2000	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between FWRLX and FBMPX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FWRLX vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRLX

FWRLX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FWRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FWRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FWRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FWRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FWRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FBMPX

FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWRLX	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.26	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	3.04	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.39	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	2.57	+1.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.33	9.74	+3.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRLX and FBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWRLX	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.26	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.62	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.79	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.65	-0.37

Drawdowns

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRLX drawdown since its inception was -79.37%, which is greater than FBMPX's maximum drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRLX and FBMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWRLX	FBMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.37%	-61.77%	-17.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.69%	-16.90%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-23.20%	+7.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.01%	-47.42%	+15.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.01%	-47.42%	+15.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-2.38%	+1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.41%	-10.63%	-9.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	4.45%	-1.59%

Volatility

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) at 4.62%. This indicates that FWRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWRLX	FBMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	4.62%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	13.89%	-1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.23%	19.02%	-3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.09%	23.25%	-5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	21.96%	-3.66%

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRLX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWRLX vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison

FWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than FBMPX's 12.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	12.09%	8.09%	7.05%	0.00%	0.00%	5.88%	3.74%	35.43%	15.29%	5.53%	7.50%	7.29%
FWRLX Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio	1.30%	6.59%	9.06%	2.38%	9.26%	7.53%	6.95%	2.74%	16.03%	3.57%	6.57%	7.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWRLX and FBMPX in my portfolio?

FWRLX and FBMPX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FWRLX or FBMPX?

FWRLX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to FBMPX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWRLX dropped -79.37% vs FBMPX's -61.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.