PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWRLX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRLX achieves a 34.20% return, which is significantly higher than FSMDX's 12.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FWRLX has outperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 14.32%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.


FWRLX

1D
0.00%
1M
10.63%
YTD
34.20%
6M
26.94%
1Y
37.67%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
14.32%

FSMDX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.17%
YTD
12.00%
6M
12.70%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWRLX
Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio
34.20%2.20%17.12%25.97%-27.86%12.15%33.39%40.17%-6.37%24.87%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
12.00%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRLX and FSMDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.80

The correlation between FWRLX and FSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWRLX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRLX
FWRLX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWRLXFSMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

1.69

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.34

2.44

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

2.79

+1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.33

10.78

+2.54

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRLX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWRLXFSMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.69

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.45

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.60

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.69

-0.42

Drawdowns

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRLX drawdown since its inception was -79.37%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRLX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWRLXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.37%

-40.35%

-39.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-8.16%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-20.92%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-26.07%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.01%

-40.35%

+8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-4.96%

-15.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.11%

+0.75%

Volatility

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (FWRLX) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 3.28%. This indicates that FWRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWRLXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

3.28%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

9.92%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

13.43%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.09%

18.25%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

19.32%

-1.02%

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRLX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWRLX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than FSMDX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.98%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
FWRLX
Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio
1.30%6.59%9.06%2.38%9.26%7.53%6.95%2.74%16.03%3.57%6.57%7.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWRLX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FWRLX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to FSMDX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWRLX dropped -79.37% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FWRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWRLX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer