PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTCX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTCX achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTCX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 7.99%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


FSTCX

1D
-1.33%
1M
3.48%
YTD
22.50%
6M
23.09%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
7.99%

FCNTX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.72%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.12%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
27.03%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
22.50%11.63%21.18%7.29%-16.99%-2.69%20.63%20.43%-8.03%1.44%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.01%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTCX and FCNTX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1985

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTCX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTCX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTCX
FSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTCXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

1.83

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.54

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.26

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.20

9.62

+1.58

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTCX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTCXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.83

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.79

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.89

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.78

-0.31

Drawdowns

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTCX drawdown since its inception was -82.81%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTCX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTCXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.81%

-49.19%

-33.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-11.30%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.00%

-19.75%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.14%

-32.59%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-32.59%

-1.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-0.30%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-8.16%

-16.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.65%

+0.15%

Volatility

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.24%. This indicates that FSTCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTCXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

3.24%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

10.48%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

14.06%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

19.15%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

19.68%

-1.69%

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTCX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.32%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
2.39%2.57%2.19%3.72%8.13%15.37%8.11%3.33%3.23%19.90%6.40%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTCX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTCX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FCNTX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTCX dropped -82.81% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTCX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer