PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTCX vs. FBMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTCX achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than FBMPX's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTCX has underperformed FBMPX with an annualized return of 6.22%, while FBMPX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.31% annualized return.


FSTCX

1D
-0.93%
1M
-0.90%
6M
2.98%
YTD
12.22%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
6.22%
ALL TIME*
9.36%

FBMPX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-5.72%
6M
-1.53%
YTD
2.86%
1Y
17.82%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
16.31%
ALL TIME*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
12.22%11.63%21.18%7.29%-16.99%-2.69%20.63%20.43%-8.03%1.44%
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
2.86%37.07%35.98%56.85%-38.30%15.97%35.48%33.14%-3.52%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTCX and FBMPX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1986

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTCX and FBMPX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTCX vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSTCX
FSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FBMPX
FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTCXFBMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.16

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.05

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

3.58

-0.89

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the FBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTCX and FBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTCX drawdown since its inception was -82.81%, which is greater than FBMPX's maximum drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTCX and FBMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTCXFBMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.81%

-61.77%

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-16.90%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.00%

-23.20%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.48%

-47.42%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-47.42%

+13.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.41%

-9.34%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.58%

-10.61%

-13.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

4.97%

-0.87%

Volatility

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) is 4.64%, while Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that FSTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTCXFBMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

6.85%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.13%

16.12%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

20.50%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

23.50%

-5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

22.09%

-4.01%

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBMPX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison

FSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than FBMPX's 13.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
13.02%8.09%7.05%0.00%0.00%5.88%3.74%35.43%15.29%5.53%7.50%7.29%
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
3.18%2.57%2.19%3.72%8.13%15.37%8.11%3.33%3.23%19.90%6.40%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTCX and FBMPX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBMPX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to FSTCX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTCX dropped -82.81% vs FBMPX's -61.77%.

FBMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTCX and FBMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer