FSTCX vs. FBMPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX).
FSTCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985. FBMPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1986.
Performance
FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTCX Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio | 11.69% | 11.63% | 21.18% | 7.29% | -16.99% | -2.69% | 20.63% | 20.43% | -8.03% | 1.44% |
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | -11.69% | 37.07% | 35.98% | 56.85% | -38.30% | 15.97% | 35.48% | 33.14% | -3.52% | 12.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTCX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than FBMPX's -11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTCX has underperformed FBMPX with an annualized return of 7.02%, while FBMPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.
FSTCX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 15.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
FBMPX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- YTD
- -11.69%
- 6M
- -9.17%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSTCX vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank
FSTCX
FBMPX
FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTCX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.77 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.39 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | 5.33 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTCX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.48 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.68 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.63 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTCX and FBMPX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison
FSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than FBMPX's 9.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTCX Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio | 2.30% | 2.57% | 2.19% | 3.72% | 8.13% | 15.37% | 8.11% | 3.33% | 3.23% | 19.90% | 6.40% | 1.99% |
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | 9.16% | 8.09% | 7.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 3.74% | 35.43% | 15.29% | 5.53% | 7.50% | 7.29% |
Drawdowns
FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTCX drawdown since its inception was -82.81%, which is greater than FBMPX's maximum drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTCX and FBMPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTCX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.81% | -61.77% | -21.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -16.90% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.08% | -47.42% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -47.42% | +13.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -16.90% | +13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -10.66% | -14.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 4.40% | -1.04% |
Volatility
FSTCX vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) is 5.95%, while Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that FSTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSTCX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 7.07% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 13.79% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 23.07% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 23.13% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 21.83% | -3.96% |