PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWMIX vs. RLBGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Washington Mutual F3 (FWMIX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWMIX achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than RLBGX's 9.84% return.


FWMIX

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.84%
YTD
5.60%
6M
6.24%
1Y
18.12%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*

RLBGX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.58%
YTD
9.84%
6M
10.80%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWMIX
American Funds Washington Mutual F3
5.60%17.55%19.35%17.58%-8.17%28.85%8.01%25.14%-5.90%19.05%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
9.84%18.83%15.35%13.92%-11.85%16.10%11.20%18.95%-3.07%13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FWMIX and RLBGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FWMIX and RLBGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWMIX vs. RLBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWMIX
FWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RLBGX
RLBGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RLBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RLBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual F3 (FWMIX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWMIXRLBGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

3.01

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

4.20

-1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.57

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.75

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.94

16.97

-7.03

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the RLBGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWMIX and RLBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWMIXRLBGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.01

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.95

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.98

-0.20

Drawdowns

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWMIX drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than RLBGX's maximum drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWMIX and RLBGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWMIXRLBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-22.33%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-6.98%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-10.65%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-18.59%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-2.46%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.54%

+0.38%

Volatility

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Washington Mutual F3 (FWMIX) is 2.40%, while American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that FWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWMIXRLBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

2.64%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

6.85%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

8.71%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

10.49%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

10.67%

+6.04%

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWMIX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than RLBGX's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FWMIX vs. RLBGX - Dividend Comparison

FWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than RLBGX's 7.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWMIX
American Funds Washington Mutual F3
9.87%10.38%10.37%6.43%6.64%6.34%3.35%6.40%4.67%7.54%0.00%0.00%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
7.83%8.56%7.50%2.27%2.63%4.59%4.65%3.78%5.81%4.92%4.54%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FWMIX and RLBGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RLBGX has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to FWMIX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWMIX dropped -34.65% vs RLBGX's -22.33%.

RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWMIX and RLBGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer